![]() |
Cheryl Schultz |
|
Research Interests Representative Publications Schultz, C. B., C. Russell, and L. Wynn. 2007. Restoration, reintroduction and captive propagation efforts for at-risk butterflies: a review of British and American conservation efforts. Accepted, pending minor revision. Invited submission to Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution for special issue on Butterfly Conservation. Crone, E. E., D. Pickering and C. B. Schultz. 2007. Can captive rearing promote recovery of endangered butterflies? An assessment in the face of uncertainty. Biological Conservation 139:103-112. McIntire, E., C. B. Schultz, and E. E. Crone. 2007. Designing a network for butterfly habitat restoration: Where individuals, populations and landscapes interact. Journal of Applied Ecology. 44: 725-736. Campbell, B. H., B. Altman, E. Bangs, D. W. Smith, B. Csuti, D. Hays, F. Slavens, K. Slavens,C. B. Schultz, and R. W. Butler. 2006. Restoring wildlife populations. in D. Apostol and M. Sinclair (eds.) Restoring the Pacific Northwest: The Art and Science of Ecological Restoration in Cascadia. Island Press, Washington, DC. 351-392. Schultz, C. B, and E. E. Crone. 2005. Patch size and isolation thresholds for butterfly habitat restoration. Conservation Biology 19: 887-896. Winfree, R., J. Dushoff, E. E. Crone, C. B. Schultz, R. Budny, N. Williams, C. Kremen. 2005. Simple indices of habitat proximity: General uses and empirical tests. American Naturalist 165: 707-717. Crone, E. E. and C. B. Schultz. 2003. Minimum patch size for population persistence in an endangered Oregon butterfly. in C. Boggs, W. Watt, and P. Ehrlich (eds.) Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight: Butterflies as Model Study Systems. University of Chicago Press. Chicago. 561-576. Holl, K. D., E. E. Crone., and C. B. Schultz. 2003. Landscape restoration: moving from generalities to methodologies. BioScience. 53: 491-502. Schultz, C. B. and P.C. Hammond. 2003. Using population viability analysis to develop recovery criteria for endangered insects: Case study of the Fender’s blue butterfly. Conservation Biology. 17: 1372-1385. Wilson, M. V, T. Erhart,, P. C. Hammond, T. N. Kaye, K. Kuykendall, A. Liston, C. B. Schultz, and P. M. Severns. 2003. The Biology of Kincaid’s lupine (Lupinus sulphureus spp. kincaidii), a threatened species of western Oregon native prairies. Natural Areas Journal 23: 72-83. Schultz, C. B. and L. R. Gerber. 2002. Are Endangered Species Act recovery plans improving with practice? Ecological Applications 12: 641 – 647. Gerber, L. R. and C. B. Schultz. 2001. Authorship and the use of science in Endangered Species Act recovery plans. Conservation Biology 15: 1308-1314. Schultz, C. B. 2001. Restoring resources for an endangered butterfly. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 1007 - 1019. Schultz, C. B. and E. E. Crone. 2001. Edge-mediated dispersal behavior in a prairie butterfly. Ecology 82: Schultz, C. B. and K. Dlugosch. 1999. Effects of declining food resources on populations of the Schultz, C. B. 1998. Dispersal behavior and its implications for reserve design for a rare Oregon Schultz, C. B. and G. C. Chang. 1998. Challenges in Insect Conservation: Managing Fluctuating Populations in Disturbed Environments. in P. Fiedler and P. Kareiva (eds.) Conservation Biology for the Coming Decade. Chapman Hall. New York. 228-254. Schultz, C. B. and E. E. Crone. 1998. Burning prairie to restore butterfly habitat? A modeling approach for management tradeoffs for the Fender’s blue. Restoration Ecology 6: 244-252. Courses |
||
