Course Assignments will be made throughout the
semester. You will be asked to do at least the following:
1. A mathematical autobiography, and an accompanying class presentation.
DUE WEEK 4
2. A classroom-focused analysis of the mathematical environment in your
placement classroom.
DUE WEEK 6
3. Mathematics instruction activities.
ASSIGNED PERIODICALLY THROUGHOUT THE SEMESTER
OPTION 1:
You have been placed in a classroom in which the teaching of
mathematics occurs, probably most every day, and that utilizes a
mathematics textbook and supplemental sources and materials. The room
also probably contains various mathematical posters, pictures,
readings, etc. The seating arrangement may be designed to specifically
support mathematical learning. Most importantly, the day-to-day format,
focus, and activity that occurs in the classroom provides details on
the mathematical environment to which the students in your placement
are exposed.
Write a 5-10 page paper that describes the mathematical environment in your placement classroom. Pictures, drawings, or other relevant visuals can be used to add depth to your description and analysis.
You are being asked to provide a "picture" of the mathematical
environment of your placement site on three levels. First, provide a
detailed account of the relationship between the physical environment
of the classroom and how (and what) the children are learning
mathematics. Second, provide an overview of the textbook and other
course materials with a focus on how these "external" materials support
(or fail to) the learning of mathematics in this classroom. Third,
provide an overview of the daily classroom mathematical activity and
environment that supports (or fails to) the mathematical development of
the students. Using all of this information, provide a summary of how
the overall mathematical environment in the classroom is supportive,
limiting, conducive, or a hindrance to the mathematical development of
the students.
I will ask myself the following questions when reading and assessing
your description:
(20 pts) Do I have a clear sense of the physical environment of the
classroom? Do I have a sense of your opinion on any connections that
might exist between the physical environment and how this could or does
affect mathematical instruction?
(20 pts) Do I have a clear sense of the content and nature of the
mathematics textbook and supporting course materials being used, and
how these impact mathematics instruction and student learning?
(20 pts) Do I have a clear sense of how mathematics is usually taught
in this classroom? Do I understand the nature and frequency of the
following: any mathematical discussions that occur; what the students
usually do; what the teacher usually does; what mathematics is
attempting to be developed; is the focus on procedures, concepts,
understanding, and/or problem solving; are there connections made to
any activity outside of the mathematics classroom?
(20 pts) Do I understand your opinion and justification as to the
degree to which you feel that the mathematics instruction in this
classroom is aligned with the NCTM Standards and Washington State EALRs?
(20 pts) Do you provide a good, overall view of how the three levels of
description provided above interact and form a coherent picture of this
mathematical environment, and how the classroom is supportive,
limiting, conducive, or a hindrance to the mathematical development of
the students?
OPTION 2:
For those of you who do not see mathematics taught regularly, you will
have to secure an elementary or middle school mathematics textbook or
set of learning materials on your own - I will assist you if necessary.
Give a careful reading of the entire textbook (and supplemental
materials if available), and then provide me with a professional review
of the book. I will ask that you be specific about the nature of your
review. In particular, I would like you to address the following
questions and provide reasons (constantly ask yourself why or why not)
for your responses:
Does the book cover appropriate mathematics for the students in your
classroom? Does it cover "powerful" mathematics? Does it focus too much
on concepts? procedures? applications?
Is the book "teachable"? Would the book support you in your own
mathematics instructional goals, or would you have to do significant
supplementation?
What are some of the best features of the book? What are some of the
worst features of the book?
If your principal asked you to give her a "thumbs up" or "thumbs down"
and provide a one-paragraph justification for your decision, what would
you respond?
I will ask myself the following questions when reading and assessing
your textbook review:
(25 pts) Do I have a good understanding of your view of the
mathematical powerful of the textbook and materials?
(25 pts) Do I have a sense of why you feel that the book would or would
not be helpful to you as a classroom teacher along the dimensions you
discuss?
(25 pts) Is your review thoughtful and reflective, or was it
superficial?
(25 pts) Does the response to the principal provide a good overall
summary of your thoughts on the worth of the textbook as an
instructional resource?