Carol Siegel

English 366 — The English Novel to 1900 – TTh 2:50-4:05

Office MMC 202S, office hours: TTh 10:00-11:00 and by appointment

Office (360) 546-9641, Home (503) 226-4272, E-Mail siegel@vancouver.wsu.edu

BASIC INFORMATION:

Attendance and participation: More than three absences may lower your grade substantially.  Because we cannot hope to discuss everything, I rely on you to direct my attention to what interests you.  Your participation will be reflected in your grade.

Students with Disabilities:  I am committed to providing assistance to help you be successful in this course. Reasonable accommodations are available for students with a documented disability. Please notify me during the first week of class of any accommodations needed for the course.  Late notification may cause the requested accommodations to be unavailable.  Students needing accommodations must have them approved through the Associate Director of Student Services, SSV, Room 203

Written Work: All written work must be typed or printed, double spaced with one inch margins all around.  Documentation must conform to MLA Works Cited style. 

Late Papers: Grades will be lowered, at my discretion, as much as one degree (e.g. from A to A-), for each class day that the paper is late.  Revisions cannot be turned in for credit after their due date.

èNOTE: No late work will be accepted for a grade after December 7 under any circumstances.

Academic Integrity:  As an institution of higher education, Washington State University is committed to principles of truth and academic honesty.  All members of the University community share the responsibility for maintaining and supporting these principles.  When a student enrolls in Washington State University, the student assumes an obligation to pursue academic endeavors in a manner consistent with the standards of academic integrity adopted by the University. To maintain the academic integrity of the community, the University cannot tolerate acts of academic dishonesty including any forms of cheating, plagiarism, or fabrication. Washington State University reserves the right and the power to discipline or to exclude students who engage in academic dishonesty.  Consult handout on avoiding plagiarism for guidance.

WRITING ASSIGNMENTS AND GRADES: Two 6-8 page papers are required.  You may write on any topic so long as you focus on one or more of the texts assigned for this class and follow the guidelines in the "Writing About Literature" handout.  Both papers should be arguments in which you make an interpretive claim about a literary text (or texts) and then devote the rest of the paper to supporting that claim.  Each paper will count as ½ of your grade, prior to adjustment for attendance and participation. Work will be graded on a twelve point scale (A+=12, F=0).


REQUIRED TEXTS:

Aphra Behn, Oroonoko

Daniel Defoe, Moll Flanders

Eliza Heywood, Love in Excess

Jane Austen, Sense and Sensibility

Charlotte Brontë, Jane Eyre

William Makepeace Thackeray, Vanity Fair

Charles Dickens, David Copperfield

Thomas Hardy, Tess of the D'Urbervilles

Syllabus

Tuesday, August 22: Orientation: Development of the Novel, Literary Traditions

Thursday, August 24: Oroonoko

 

Tuesday, August 29: Love in Excess, Part One

Thursday, August 31: Love in Excess, Part Two

 

Tuesday, September 5: Finish Love in Excess

Thursday, September 7: The Preface of Moll Flanders and through p. 84, up to "I came away for England in the Month of August. . ."

 

Tuesday, September 12: Moll Flanders through p. 224 up to the section that begins "My poor Governess was utterly Disconsolate . . ."

Thursday, September 14: Finish Moll Flanders

 

Tuesday, September 19: Paper #1 Due.  Lecture, The backlash against Romanticism 

Thursday, September 21:, Sense and Sensibility, Volume 1

 

Tuesday, September 26: Sense and Sensibility, Volume 2

Thursday, September 28: Finish Sense and Sensibility

 

Tuesday, October 3: Jane Eyre, Volume 1

Thursday, October 5: Jane Eyre, Volume 2

 

Tuesday, October 10: Finish Jane Eyre

Thursday, October 12: READING DAY.  No Class will be held today, please use the time to get as far as possible into Vanity Fair.

 

Tuesday, October 17: Vanity Fair, through Chapter XVIII

Thursday, October 19: Vanity Fair, through Chapter LV

 

Tuesday, October 24: Finish Vanity Fair. Final Day to turn in revision of paper 1

Thursday, October 26: Film in Class

 

Tuesday, October 31: Film in Class

Thursday, November 2: David Copperfield, through Chapter IX.  

 

Tuesday, November 7: David Copperfield, through Chapter XXIV

Thursday, November 9: David Copperfield, through Chapter XL

 

Tuesday, November 14: Finish David Copperfield

Thursday, November 16: Paper #2 Due. Lecture on the movement toward modernism.

 

Tuesday, November 21: THANKSGIVING BREAK

Thursday, November 23: THANKSGIVING BREAK

 

Tuesday, November 28: Tess of the D'Urbervilles, Phases 1 & 2

Thursday, November 30: Tess of the D'Urbervilles, Phases 3 & 4

 

Tuesday, December 5: Tess of the D'Urbervilles, Phases 5 & 6 & 7.

Thursday, December 7: Last Day of Class.  LAST DAY TO TURN IN PAPER #2 REVISION.  (revision is optional.)  Marked original MUST accompany revision. This is the FINAL DATE for me to RECEIVE late work, if it is to be read for credit.  Retrospective. Evaluations.


A SHORT GUIDE TO WRITING ABOUT LITERATURE

Resources: The Writing Center will help you with grammar, organization, and documentation as well as more complex problems.

Form: To be accepted for a grade, papers must be either typed or printed on a computer printer.  No hand-written or hand-printed papers will be read for credit.  Papers must have all the usual attributes of college essays: a TITLE, an introduction, unified and coherent body paragraphs, a conclusion, and standard documentation of quotes.  Standard grammar and usage are also expected.  All references to events that occur within texts should be in present tense.  Any grammar and composition handbook will answer most of your questions about grammar and usage.

Organization/Structure:  Papers should be organized in a standard, reader-friendly manner.  The thesis should appear in the introduction.  Each paragraph in the body of the paper should be focused on one main claim in support of your thesis, and everything else in the paragraph should develop or support that claim.  After the introduction, all claims should be followed by support form the text.  The conclusion should sum up the main points made and connect them to the thesis.

The Topic:  Choose your own topic, but make it conform to the following guidelines.

1. The topic should focus on the assigned reading, not on things in your experience or observation that the reading made you think about.  How your own life resembles that of David Copperfield, for example, although obviously interesting, would not be an appropriate topic for an essay on that novel.  Also inappropriate, would be an essay on the topic of why Jane Eyre does not accurately portray 19th century English experience, because to support such an assertion you would have to do a great deal of research in social history.  Nor will an essay work that has as its thesis that Moll Flanders shows an ignorance of what love really is since implied in such a statement is the idea that only you know what love is.  Instead, you might want to discuss how the novel conveys its standards for evaluating different kinds of romantic relationships according to how "true" the love is.  An appropriate topic for such a discussion would be Defoe’s use of specific incidents in Moll's life to suggest how social ideologies create conflicting values and their impact on human relationships.

2. The topic should not treat fictional characters as real people or what happens in fiction as real events.  Much of our pleasure in reading comes from understanding things this way as we read.  But analysis demands that we mentally stand back and think about how effects are achieved.  That Marianne in Sense and Sensibility should throw caution to the wind and take more risks is not an appropriate topic for an essay because it dismisses what the novel actually tells us and substitutes a story based on your concept of what should happen in real life.  Likewise, you should not choose a topic like Becky Sharp in Vanity Fair will no doubt be punished more severely later for her bad behavior.  That topic implies that she is a real person with an existence that continues when the text is over.  Instead you might focus on how the text defines what success in life is and how the depiction of the character's fates at the conclusion relates to this definition.

3. The topic should be limited to fit the scope of the paper and should give your reader direction.  Don’t try to say everything possible about any text.  The title of the text you are discussing cannot also be the title of  your paper since this implies that you are going to say everything that can be said about the text.  Successful topics are found by focusing on one particular aspect of a literary work or group of works.  You might choose to write about any ONE of the following: how certain types of relationships between people are depicted, how social issues are handled, how certain images (from nature, for example) or colors are used to create, how material is structured, how two texts that seem in many ways similar differ in one crucial way--or vice versa, tensions in the text where contradictory ideas are presented and seem unresolved.  Many successful papers explore the ways that content (what the text is about) and form (the way the contents are presented) either work together or at cross purposes.  If you aren’t sure whether your topic will work, please discuss it with me.

The Thesis:  Every successful essay has a clear thesis.  Don’t confuse the topic with the thesis.  Your thesis is the main point you make about your topic.  Your thesis cannot be “The difference between Love in Excess and Tess of the D'Urbervilles.”  That is a topic.  A successful thesis derived from this topic could be something like this: “While both Love in Excess and Tess of the D'Urbervilles use depictions of romantic triangles to convey opinions about the nature of love and marriage, the authors’ treatment of their material reflects their different attitudes about the gendering of virtue. Moreover, both novels suggest a link between sexual passion and death.  However, Hardy seems most interested in demonstrating a pessimistic view of the impact on individuals of social/cultural concepts of what is sexually appropriate, while Haywood seems most interested in providing a wish-fulfillment fantasy of poetic justice that rewards romantic devotion.  Thus in her novel, individual feelings can prevail against social restraints and, in fact, seem destined to do so.  (Note that a thesis for a paper longer than 4 pages is rarely one sentence long.)  

Your thesis must make a different point about your topic than the author makes.  That is, if, for instance, your topic is the way Aphra Behn depicts slavery in Oroonoko, your thesis cannot be that slavery is wrong because it forces good, noble people into untenable situations.  That is Behn’s own point, so if you were to develop it as your thesis, you would just be repeating, in your own words, the plot of the novel.  Instead, you might look at how Behn contrasts Oroonoko's belief system the behavior that results to that of the majority of the novel's Christians in order to call into question the ethics of slavery.   Keep in mind that your thesis must be complex enough to give you material for a paper of the required length.  A paper thesis needs to include two or more subtopics, the development of which will structure your paper.   In choosing a thesis, ask yourself not only what ideas the text conveys but how they are conveyed.  Remember that your reader already knows what is said in the text.  In trying to find something interesting to say about it, ask yourself what details cause you to interpret the text as you do and what about the way it is written gives you specific impressions.

Supporting Evidence:  As much as you need to present your own ideas, you need to convince your reader that they are reasonable and worth considering.  You do this by presenting supporting evidence for your claims.  There are three ways to do this in an English paper.

1. While it isn’t required for either paper, you may do research.  If you do, keep in mind two things:  

            (A) Expert opinions are still just opinions, consequently they can never prove a point.  Therefore, when you quote a literary critic's idea about a text, you have not shown that this is the correct view to have.  If you agree with the critic that is very nice, but you still have to explain what in the text being discussed causes you to agree.  Sometimes the critic will present evidence that supports your idea.  If the evidence is factual, that is, if it consists of a reference to something that actually occurs in the text or to a verifiable feature of the text (such as that it is divided into six stanzas each on a different topic) then you have proof.  If you agree with the critic, you must sum up the argument and add your own ideas in an effort to convince your reader. Remember that you can also include views that you disagree with in order to argue with them.

            (B) If you and a critic say the same thing, mention this in your discussion.

2. You may, and in most cases should, quote from the text you are discussing.  When quoting, avoid providing too much material (words or phrases that are irrelevant to your point) or providing too little material (so that your reason for thinking this supports your assertion is unclear).  When it is not clear why you think that a quote supports your claim, you must explain how it does.  The most common fear among students in English classes is that they will explain something that does not need to be explained.  This almost never happens.  When in doubt, explain.

3. You may summarize or paraphrase.  When you do either of these things remember that you should be supporting a claim, not refreshing the reader’s memory about what happens in the story.  Don’t introduce your idea about a specific scene with a summary of the events leading up to this scene.

GUIDE TO REVISION

1) The revision must be turned in with the marked and graded original.  No exceptions.

2) Appropriate changes must be made in response to EVERY comment on the original.  If more than 3 comments are not responded to, I’ll stop marking the paper.  If you don’t know what a comment means or how to respond to it, ask. If you can’t see me about it, see the Writing Center.

3) For much improvement in your grade you need to respond with thorough revision to general comments about conventions, such as reminders to use present tense throughout or to follow MLA Handbook documentation style, and to general comments about development such as to tighten paragraph focus throughout or to relate ideas back to the thesis.

4) Correct all grammar error and typing errors, even if they were not marked. Part of revising is going over your work extra carefully.

5) Revisions must be turned in by the due dates on the syllabus  -- no exceptions