Practical Assessment:
- Real solutions to real needs that you all can go forth and implement
- Activity: brainstorming existing assessment needs
- Activity: matching needs with methods
- Design Assessment
- Assessing personal projects, creations, and instruction
- Small scale, "Did it work?", quick and dirty assessments
- Program Assessment
- Larger scale & more scientific assessment of programs and services
- Surveys, focus groups, program assessment, etc.
[any material that should appear in print but not on the slide]
Activity: Brainstorm assessment needs
- What do you need to assess? (needs)
- What kind of assessment needs to you have?
- What do you want to measure?
- What have you created?
- Do you need to justify a funding request?
[any material that should appear in print but not on the slide]
Design Assessment:
- Objects we design:
- classes, web pages, handouts, activities, etc
- We can learn from designers outside of libraries (instruction, web, and game designers)
- Build assessment into our designs
[Notes:]
Informal
Instruction
- Designers (web & game) have a lot to teach us about this kind of assessment methodology
- By building assessment into the process of designing services and events, we can make measuring their impact and success much, much easier.
- If we think about how we are going to measure success, we are *much* more likely to focus in on the essential elements of our projects
Outcomes Oriented Design:
From Deb Gilchrist and the ACRL IL Immersion faculty (modified)
- What do we want you to be able to do? (Outcome)
- Identify practical assessment solutions for your libraries' needs
- What do you need to know in order to do this well? (Content)
- Basic library assessment principles
- Your assessment needs
- Examples of assessment methodologies
- Criteria for selecting a methodology
- What activity will facilitate the learning? (Action)
- Brainstorm list of assessment needs
- Group activity (brainstorming / matching)
[Notes:]
Deb's orginal 5 questions for Assessment Design
- What do you want the student to be able to do? (Outcome)
- What does the student need to know in order to do this well? (Curriculum)
- What activity will facilitate the learning? (Pedagogy)
Outcomes: continued
- How will you demonstrate the learning? (Assessment)
- Observation of brainstorm and group activity ("Anthropologist")
- Implementing new assessment techniques in their libraries and reporting back (Modified blog comment)
- Clearest Point / Muddiest Point
- How will we know if you all have done this well? (Criteria)
- Active engagement in discussion and activities
- Successfully match solutions to the list of needs
[Notes:]
Deb's orginal 5 questions for Assessment Design continued:
4. How will the student demonstrate the learning? (Assessment)
5. How will I know the student has done this well? (Criteria)
Many Small Assessments
- Don't let assessment infrastructure outweigh your service
- Vary techniques and measure different things
- Make the assessment part of the design rather than tacked-on as an afterthought
[Notes:]
- This is why many people have negative feelings toward the word "assessment"
- Kafkaesque bureaucratic nightmare!!! (What happens when we bring up standardized testing? This is a common association of "outcomes" and "assessment".)
- Don't get hung up on contradictions, just make sure you talk to as many of the 6 blind men as you can!
Many Small Methodologies:
- Muddiest point / clearest point assessment
- Peer review assessment
- Quick write / journal assessment
"Don't Listen to Users"
- To design an easy-to-use interface, pay attention to what users do, not what they say. Self-reported claims are unreliable, as are user speculations about future behavior. (Jakob Nielson on web usability)
- Similar to a reference interview: respectful ≠ literal
- Anthropologist Assessment: be an anthropologist, forensic detective, or other keen observer of user behavior as patrons interact with the object you have designed
[Notes:]
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20010805.html
look beyond the literal phrasing of the patron's comment to diagnose deeper issues with your expert's judgment
We usually aren't measuring how much they like us, or how polite they are
Assessment 2.0
[Notes:]
We don't have to think they will usher in the golden age of the library to take advantage of them
Built in feedback (assessment) tools!
Find other sources of assessment
- Snitch assessment
- Ask other assessors / evaluators
- Parents or teachers
[Notes:]
- Remember: focus on behaviors and observed activities
- "Did performance improve?"
Who else does assessment?
- Educators
- CAT Classroom Assessment Techniques
- ACRL Immersion
- People who think about the web:
- Video Game Designers:
- Kim Swift and Valve Software's Portal team
- Watch the developers' commentary from Portal, part of the Xbox 360 and PC game package The Orange Box
Program Assessment
- Larger scale & more scientific assessment of programs and services
- Surveys, focus groups, program assessment, etc.
[Notes:]
In General:
- Be not afraid
- Be inclusive
- Compatible methodology
- Action related reasons
- Report your outcomes to stakeholders
- Use your data!!
- Implement changes
Focus Groups and Interviews:
- Use when:
- You are unsure of the issues
- To write survey questions
- To target a specific population
- When you want to know WHY
- Focus groups are more efficient and economical than one to one
Issues:
- Plan ahead
- Cost to the library
- Food for group members
- Other incentives
- Facilitator skills are very important
- Good to have a note taker, too
- Transcription is tedious
A Tiny Little Survey:
[notes field]
Surveys:
- When other methods won't work
- Strategic planning
- Patron satisfaction
- Plan for additional services
- Gap analysis
- Large number of respondents
- Quantitative analysis
Issues:
- Time consuming
- Good questions are key
- Cost
- Paper or electronic: email or web site
- Analysis
- Tally paper by hand or electronically
- Survey Monkey
- SPSS
Survey Monkey Results:
[Notes:]
I use the library for: (mark all that apply)
- Individual study
- Class related computer use
- Personal use of computers
- etc. w/ percentages of respondents that answered... including the number of people who answered that question
SPSS Results:
[notes field]
Space Studies:
- When you can make changes
- Moving furniture
- Remodeling
- New building
- When you have to prioritize
- When parts of your building are not being used
- To validate other studies
[any material that should appear in print but not on the slide]
Issues:
- Not a lot of literature on this topic
- You get to be creative!!
- Can bring up questions for a survey or validate survey
- General questions
- Target specific area of issues
[any material that should appear in print but not on the slide]
Seating Survey:
[any material that should appear in print but not on the slide]
Rubrics:
- All purpose tool for assessment
- A guide for rating performance with a full range of descriptors for each level
- You can use them to assess almost anything
- Validity with several evaluators
[any material that should appear in print but not on the slide]
Information Literacy
[any material that should appear in print but not on the slide]
Issues:
Pros: |
Cons: |
|
|
|
|
|
- Easy to close the feedback loop
|
|
- Dependent on available resources
|
|
|
|
Links to Presentation Materials