Washington State University, Vancouver 
Management 487: Seminar in Business Ethics – Fall 2007
Professor Jerry Goodstein

Course Description and Goals

In this seminar we will examine ethical issues in the context of business theory and practice. In the process of exploring these issues and raising questions, we will draw on a wide body of literatures including the humanities, management theory, and the social sciences. Among the most important goals of this course are: (1) to jointly examine thoughtfully ideas and perspectives in the field of business ethics and extend these ideas/perspectives to administrative practice and decision making; and (2) to enhance our moral sensibility and expand our capacity for moral inquiry, dialogue, and decision making in ways that will be useful in our professional and civic lives. A variety of teaching methods will be used to facilitate achieving these goals including class case discussions, small group discussions, mini-lectures, and videos/films. 

Course Requirements

Cases (50%)
For each of the two assigned cases (denoted with asterisk) you are required to prepare a case analysis (seven pages maximum, double-space with 12 point type and 1” margins) with a supporting ethics matrix (this will be discussed in class). Each case analysis will include sections devoted to: (1) defining the ethical issues in the case; (2) analyzing the case using the frameworks/readings assigned in the course; (3) providing recommendations; and (4) discussing the broad implications of the case. The ethics matrix will provide you with a means to help organize your ethical analyses, while allowing me to gain an overview of the critical considerations you have taken into account in preparing your case analyses. I will be going over the case analyses in greater depth on August 31 and September 7. Cases that do not follow the guidelines outlined above will not be accepted for credit.

It is expected that whenever possible, you will be present in class to turn in and discuss your case analyses. If for some reason you cannot make class, please let me know in advance and make plans to have the case turned in before the beginning of class either by another student, via fax, etc. Cases will not be accepted after the beginning of the class when the case is due.

Socially Responsible Business Profile (15%)

       This course provides you with an opportunity to explore a company that has developed ethically sound policies in a number of domains, for example, community service, environmental responsibility, work-family programs, labor practices, etc. You are asked to prepare a 5-7 page (double spaced, 12 point font, 1”margins) company profile that corresponds to the following outline:

(1)   Briefly describe the company indicating its size, the industry or industries the company operates in, and the mission and values of the company.

(2)   Discuss in depth how this particular organization pursues socially responsible business practices. You may choose to focus in on one area (e.g., work-family programs), or discuss a variety of initiatives.

(3)   How well can the policies, programs, or practices you have highlighted be applied to other companies? What unique elements of the company (e.g., its culture, leadership support) may be particularly important in shaping the company’s commitment to socially responsible business practices?       

I will evaluate your paper based on how thoroughly and thoughtfully you have addressed the three areas outlined above (especially sections 2 & 3). You are strongly encouraged to use research resources (www.business-ethics.com) and interviews in developing your paper. I will ask for references of source materials you used in preparing your profile. You will be asked to share your company profile with class members in small group discussions. On your assigned date of presentation, be prepared to turn in your paper and provide students with a brief summary of your paper. Papers will not be accepted after the due date you have been assigned.

Student Ethics Mini-Case (15%)
An important way to integrate your workplace ethics experiences is through ethics mini-cases. These mini-cases should be one-page and single-spaced. I will hand out a sample case study to you in class. This should give you a good sense of how to present the information in the case and lead up to the central ethical dilemma. If at all possible, I would like you to draw on your experience (direct or indirect) in the workplace. You do not have to identify the company or use real names if you are uncomfortable in revealing this information.

Try to select a case that you believe others will identify with either because they have faced similar situations or may face a similar situation in the future. The cases can address issues similar to those discussed in class or raise important issues/dilemmas we may not have been able to discuss. Consider cases where there is a real ethical dilemma and where the class has to struggle with some tough ethical issues and make a recommendation on taking action in the case. 

The cases will be due on the dates outlined in the syllabus (please make copies for everyone in discussion group) and each of you will be assigned one of the dates specified in the syllabus. After students have read the mini-case in class, the group should discuss how they would resolve the ethical dilemma. I’ll then ask you to share with them the decision you made and the justification for your decision. In addition to turning in your one-page case, you will be responsible for a three-five page (double-space with 1” margins) write-up that includes the central ethical issues brought out in the case, what you learned from this particular dilemma and how (if at all) the experience influenced your character, and what lessons you can pass on to others who might face similar situations.

Class Participation (20%)
        Since this course is designed as a seminar, you are strongly encouraged to take an active part in class discussions. My hope is that we create an environment conducive to participation and characterized by thoughtful inquiry, attentive listening, and respectful dialogue. In assessing this component of your grade I will consider your presence for the course discussions (cases, ethics journal, etc.), the extent to which you were an active participant, and the quality of your contributions to course discussions. 

Required Reading

The following book is available in the WSUV Bookstore:
Business Ethics, 6th Edition, Richard DeGeorge

The book Nickle & Dimed, by Barbara Ehrenreich, is required for the course. The book is widely available in bookstores and on-line in paperback.

A number of required readings have been placed on electronic reserve with the WSU Vancouver Library (noted by "R" in syllabus). You can gain access to these readings through visiting  http://eres.wsulibs.wsu.edu/eres/coursepass.aspx?cid=827. I will provide a password for you to use in class.

There are a number of assigned cases as well that you will purchase directly from the Harvard Business School (identified in the syllabus by “HBS”). Instructions on how to purchase the cases will be sent directly to you.

Office Hours
I will have office hours (Classroom Building 308U) on Friday morning, 9:00 – 10:45. If this period is inconvenient, we can arrange a different time to meet. You can reach me by phone (360-546-9755) or email (mailto:goodstei@vancouver.wsu.edu). My fax number on campus is 360-546-9037.

Availability of Final Grades and Cases/Projects

Final grades will be submitted two weeks after the conclusion of the course. Final grades are available on METRO the day following grade submission. If you want your final case and/or project returned to you, please leave me a SASE on the final day of class.

Academic Integrity & Academic Dishonesty

Students are expected to uphold the WSU standard of conduct relating to academic dishonesty (see WSU Student Handbook, WAC 504-25-015). Students assume full responsibility for the content and integrity of the academic work they submit. The guiding principle of academic integrity shall be that a student’s submitted work, examinations, reports, and projects must be that student’s own work. Students shall be guilty of violating the honor code if they: 1. Represent the work of others as their own. 2. Use or obtain unauthorized assistance in any academic work. 3. Give unauthorized assistance to other students. 4. Modify, without instructor approval, an examination, paper, record or report for the purpose of obtaining additional credit. 5. Misrepresent the content of submitted work. The penalty for violating the honor code is severe. The first offense will result in a failing grade for the course. All offenses will be reported to the Office of Student Affairs. If a student is unclear about whether a particular situation may constitute an honor code violation, the student should meet with the instructor to discuss the situation.

Student Conduct & Deportment

Per the WSU Vancouver Student Handbook, students are, “Expected to show due respect for …the rights of others.” For example, “While students have the right to freedom of expression…this expression cannot interfere with the rights of others or disrupt the processes of the University. Any malicious act which causes harm to any person’s physical or mental well being is prohibited.” Such activities include sexual harassment, discrimination, intimidation (e.g. bullying or belittling fellow students), disruptive behavior (e.g., loud talking in class, or slanderous comments made about other students or faculty (e.g., false and unsubstantiated claims of discrimination made for the purpose of improving grades). Students should be familiar with the Washington State University standards for student conduct presented in the WSU Vancouver student handbook (available from student services). “Students who fail to conduct themselves properly are subject to discipline, which may extend to temporary or permanent removal from the institution.”

Reporting Violations

Anyone wishing to report violations of the student or faculty conduct code should use the following procedures. Whenever possible, collect any documentation of the offending activity (e.g. written comments from other students or faculty, e-mail messages etc.). It is also useful for students to put their concerns in writing to faculty or administrators pursuing the matter can accurately convey the student’s concerns. Present the complaint and supporting documentation to the appropriate faculty member or administrator. The process should begin with the class instructor. If the instructor is unable to resolve the matter to the student’s satisfaction, of the problem behavior spans multiple classes, or if the nature of the problem makes this impossible, the complaint should be forwarded to the Program Director. If the matter is still not resolved to the student’s satisfaction, the complaint should proceed to the Associate Dean, then the Chancellor and finally to the University Ombudsman. See the WSU Vancouver student manual for more detail concerning this process.

Disability Accommodations

Accommodations may be available if you need them in order to fully participate in this class because of a disability. Accommodations may take some time to implement so it is critical that you contact Disability Services as soon as possible.  All accommodations must be approved through Disability Services, located in the Student Resource Center on the Lower Level of VSSC - (360) 546-9138.  

ON-CAMPUS COUNSELING is available in VCLB 160D. Phone 546-9446

 

I look forward to spending an intensive and rich Fall with you. Welcome to the course!

 

 


 

Mgt. 487: Seminar in Business Ethics Course Outline – Fall 2007

Aug. 24

Ethical Focus: Course Introduction & Overview

Recommended Reading:
DeGeorge, Chapter 1

Aug. 31

Ethical Focus: Developing A Framework for Ethical Analysis and Moral Inquiry 
Case Discussion: Pro-Tech

 Required Reading:
DeGeorge, Chapts. 3, 4, 9 (pp. 225-233)

Ethics Presentation

Sept. 7

Ethical Focus: Ethics and Authority
Case Discussion: Conflict on a Trading Floor 

Required Reading:
DeGeorge, Chapter 15 (pp. 411-415)

Student Mini-Case #1

Sept. 14

Ethical Focus: Organizational Loyalty & Whistleblowing
Case Discussion: Conflict on a Trading Floor (Sample Case)

Required Reading:
De George, Chapt. 12

“Business Ethics: A View From the Trenches,” Joseph Badaracco (R)

SRB Discussion #1

Sept. 21

Ethical Focus: Business and the Ethics of Care and Compassion
Case Discussion: Kathryn McNeil 

Required Reading:
DeGeorge, Chapt. 15

“Work and Family: The End of the Zero-Sum Game,” Stewart Friedman et al. (R)

Student Mini-Case #2

Sept. 28

Ethical Focus: Conflicts of Personal, Professional, & Organizational Ethics 
Case Discussion: *Martha McCaskey

Required Reading
De George, Chapt. 17 (esp. 455-463)

“Corporate Policy and the Ethics of Competitor Intelligence Gathering,” Lynn Sharp Paine (R)

SRB Discussion #2

Oct. 5

Business Ethics in Film: All My Sons, Arthur Miller

Recommended Reading:
All My Sons (Arthur Miller, Six Great Modern Plays)

Oct. 12

 Ethical Focus: Corporations and the Environment
Video Discussion: Exporting Harm: The High Tech Trashing of Asia

Required Reading:

DeGeorge, Chapt. 11

“Beyond Greening: Strategies for a Sustainable World,” Stuart Hart (R)

“Not in our Backyard: Exporting Electronic Waste,” Elizabeth Grossman (R)

Student Mini-Case #3

Oct. 19

Ethical Focus: Information & Privacy                                             
Case Discussion: Google Inc.: Launching G-mail

Required Reading:
DeGeorge, Chapt. 18

“Undermining Freedom of Expression in China: The Role of Yahoo!, Microsoft, and Google,” Amnesty International: http://www.amnesty.org.uk/uploads/documents/doc_17068.pdf

SRB Discussion #3

Oct. 26

Ethical Focus: The Crisis in Corporate Governance

Video Discussion: “Bigger Than Enron”

Required Reading:
“Ethical Conflicts at Enron: Moral Responsibility in Corporate Capitalism,” Sherron Watkins (R)

Student Mini-Case #4

Nov. 5*

Ethical Focus: Social Entrepreneurship

Visit to ReBuilding Center, Portland http://www.rebuildingcenter.org

Nov. 9

Ethical Focus: Social Entrepreneurship

Guest Speaker: Dr. Howard Feldman, University of Portland

Required Reading: TBA

Nov.  16*

Ethical Focus: Ethics and Globalization – Wages and Inequality

Video Discussion: Barbara Ehrenreich & Bill Moyers – “Nickel and Dimed

Required Reading:
DeGeorge, Chapter 14

Ehrenreich, “Introduction,” “Selling in Minnesota,” “Evaluation”

Nov. 23

Thanksgiving Break

Nov. 30

Ethical Focus: Ethics and Globalization – Corporate Restructuring & Outsourcing
Video Discussion: "Is Wal-Mart Good for America?"

Required Reading:

“Rejuvenating Wal-Mart’s Reputation,” Thomas Hemphill (R)

Student Mini-Case #5

Dec. 8

Ethical Focus: Ethics and Globalization  – Corporate Responsibility & Human Rights
Case Discussion: *Levi Strauss & Co.: Global Outsourcing (A) 

Required Reading:
DeGeorge: Chapt. 19, 20

“Managing for Organizational Integrity,” Lynn Sharp Paine (R)

SRB Discussion #5